<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook: New Media Teacher</title>
	<atom:link href="http://krywosa.com/2009/10/26/facebook-new-media-teacher/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://krywosa.com/2009/10/26/facebook-new-media-teacher/</link>
	<description>Marketing Strategies for Student Success</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 18:57:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David L. Mulder</title>
		<link>http://krywosa.com/2009/10/26/facebook-new-media-teacher/#comment-327</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David L. Mulder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 04:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://krywosa.com/?p=363#comment-327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Facebook seems to be branding their application as one that&#039;s not afraid to change. I think these iterative changes are easier for the userbase to absorb; all those knee-jerk backlash groups that show up seem silly to me. 

The iterative model for development seems to be one that more and more applications are taking. I don&#039;t think it&#039;s necessarily intended to create a more readily adaptable public, but that outcome is an apparent byproduct.

What&#039;s interesting to me is that as people become used to that (frequent smaller updates to design &amp; functionality), will they expect it everywhere else? Most college web design groups wait years between major revisions. If their Facebook-savvy userbase starts to get tired of the same design after a few months, that could have a significant impact on design processes across the Web.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facebook seems to be branding their application as one that&#8217;s not afraid to change. I think these iterative changes are easier for the userbase to absorb; all those knee-jerk backlash groups that show up seem silly to me. </p>
<p>The iterative model for development seems to be one that more and more applications are taking. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s necessarily intended to create a more readily adaptable public, but that outcome is an apparent byproduct.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s interesting to me is that as people become used to that (frequent smaller updates to design &amp; functionality), will they expect it everywhere else? Most college web design groups wait years between major revisions. If their Facebook-savvy userbase starts to get tired of the same design after a few months, that could have a significant impact on design processes across the Web.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TimN</title>
		<link>http://krywosa.com/2009/10/26/facebook-new-media-teacher/#comment-326</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TimN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 01:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://krywosa.com/?p=363#comment-326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After their previous redesign, I seem to recall blogging that, while I may or may not agree with all their changes, I admire that they are constantly trying to improve their product. Granted, it seems yet another way to drive up pageviews and advertising traffic, but Facebook continues to venture into an increasingly media-rich environment and try to innovate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After their previous redesign, I seem to recall blogging that, while I may or may not agree with all their changes, I admire that they are constantly trying to improve their product. Granted, it seems yet another way to drive up pageviews and advertising traffic, but Facebook continues to venture into an increasingly media-rich environment and try to innovate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

