<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook Lite: Should We Care?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://krywosa.com/2009/09/14/facebook-lite-should-we-care/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://krywosa.com/2009/09/14/facebook-lite-should-we-care/</link>
	<description>Marketing Strategies for Student Success</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 18:57:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kengaylord</title>
		<link>http://krywosa.com/2009/09/14/facebook-lite-should-we-care/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kengaylord]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 12:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://krywosa.com/?p=310#comment-302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think that one will replace the other either. As you said, I use them for two totally different purposes. Twitter is a little less personal, and I connect with people from all over the world and for a variety of different reasons. On Facebook I only connect with people that I know and trust; and subsequently only connect with the companies and organizations that I trust. 

Facebook Lite I think misses the boat, and is trying to be too Twitter-like. One of the things that I like about Facebook is the fact that I can see what my friends are doing, what games they are playing and what causes that they support; Facebook Lite does not offer this functionality.  I do have friends that would love this sort of stripped down functionality, but it is not for me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that one will replace the other either. As you said, I use them for two totally different purposes. Twitter is a little less personal, and I connect with people from all over the world and for a variety of different reasons. On Facebook I only connect with people that I know and trust; and subsequently only connect with the companies and organizations that I trust. </p>
<p>Facebook Lite I think misses the boat, and is trying to be too Twitter-like. One of the things that I like about Facebook is the fact that I can see what my friends are doing, what games they are playing and what causes that they support; Facebook Lite does not offer this functionality.  I do have friends that would love this sort of stripped down functionality, but it is not for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

